ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening occurs after long-term total hip replacement, which directly affects the service life and prospective efficacy of artificial joints. The particles produced by artificial joint wear lead to the surrounding bone dissolved, further cause loosening, among which, polyethylene particles because of acetabular liner wear stand out. OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess the acetabular liner wear, loosening and osteolysis caused by cross-linked polyethylene or conventional polyethylene after total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: A computer-based research of Medline, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, CqVip, WanFang databases before December 2015 and Cochrane (3rd issue, 2011) was performed in accordance with the retrieval strategy made by Cochrane collaboration. A manual retrieval of related bone journals and conference papers was conducted. Eleven randomized controlled trials about the wear caused by cross-linked polyethylene or conventional polyethylene after total hip arthroplasty were enrolled based on inclusion criteria, followed by a Meta-analysis using RevMan 5.0 software. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Eleven randomized controlled trials involving 952 patients were included. (2) Meta-analysis showed that the acetabular liner wear rate of cross-linked polyethylene was significantly lower than that of conventional polyethylene at 5 years postoperatively [MD=-0.07, CI(-0.09, -0.05), I2=93%, P < 0.00001]; the large heterogeneity was decreased [MD=-0.06, 95%CI (-0.07, -0.04), I2=39%, P < 0.00001] after three research removed through sensitivity analysis. (3) The osteolysis rate in the cross-linked polyethylene group was significantly lower than that in the conventional polyethylene group [RR=0.39, 95%CI (0.27, 0.57), I2=0%, P < 0.00001]. (4) These results suggest that the cross-linked polyethylene liners exhibit reduced radiological wear and osteolysis, but the mean follow-up of 5 years (1.8 to 8.0) cannot meet the long-term requirements. Therefore, multi-central, large sample size and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to testify the efficacy and safety of cross-linked polyethylene.BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening occurs after long-term total hip replacement, which directly affects the service life and prospective efficacy of artificial joints. The particles produced by artificial joint wear lead to the surrounding bone dissolved, further cause loosening, among which, polyethylene particles because of acetabular liner wear stand out. OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess the acetabular liner wear, loosening and osteolysis caused by cross-linked polyethylene or conventional polyethylene after total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: A computer-based research of Medline, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, CqVip, WanFang databases before December 2015 and Cochrane (3rd issue, 2011) was performed in accordance with the retrieval strategy made by Cochrane collaboration. A manual retrieval of related bone journals and conference papers was conducted. Eleven randomized controlled trials about the wear caused by cross-linked polyethylene or conventional polyethylene after total hip arthroplasty were enrolled based on inclusion criteria, followed by a Meta-analysis using RevMan 5.0 software. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Eleven randomized controlled trials involving 952 patients were included. (2) Meta-analysis showed that the acetabular liner wear rate of cross-linked polyethylene was significantly lower than that of conventional polyethylene at 5 years postoperatively [MD=-0.07, CI(-0.09, -0.05), I2=93%, P < 0.00001]; the large heterogeneity was decreased [MD=-0.06, 95%CI (-0.07, -0.04), I2=39%, P < 0.00001] after three research removed through sensitivity analysis. (3) The osteolysis rate in the cross-linked polyethylene group was significantly lower than that in the conventional polyethylene group [RR=0.39, 95%CI (0.27, 0.57), I2=0%, P < 0.00001]. (4) These results suggest that the cross-linked polyethylene liners exhibit reduced radiological wear and osteolysis, but the mean follow-up of 5 years (1.8 to 8.0) cannot meet the long-term requirements. Therefore, multi-central, large sample size and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to testify the efficacy and safety of cross-linked polyethylene.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:There are objections to the efficacy and safety of total hip arthroplasty and artificial femoral head arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fracture. OBJECTIVE:To assess the efficacy and safety of one-stage total hip arthroplasty and femoral head arthroplasty for > 60-year-old patients with femoral neck fractures. METHODS:According to the search strategy of Cochrane colaboration network, we searched PubMed (1966 to December 2014), EMbase (1974 to December 2014), Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2011), China Biology Medicine database(1978 to December 2014), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (1994 to December 2014), VIP database (1989 to December 2014), and Wanfang Database (1979 to December 2014). Twenty-one articles on total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for elderly femoral neck fractures were included. Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies and extracted the data. In case of disagreement, settlement was made by negotiation. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.0 software in the included studies. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1) Literature analysis: five randomized controled studies, three quasi-randomized controled studies, and thirteen retrospective cohort studies were included, containing 2 250 patients. (2) Meta-analysis: No significant differencein rate of dislocation, deep infection rate and mortality rate in 1 year after replacement was detected between total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for elderly femoral neck fractures (dislocation rate:RR=1.38, 95%CI: 0.81-2.34; deep infection rate RR=1.12, 95%CI: 0.60-2.11; mortality rateRR=0.90, 95%CI: 0.69-1.18). Reoperation rate was higher in the hemiarthroplasty group than in the total hip arthroplasty group (RR=0.46, 95%CI: 0.32-0.66). Harris score on the affected side between1 and 4 years was significantly higher in the total hip arthroplasty group than in the hemiarthroplasty group (MD=5.64, 95%CI: 2.82-8.46). (3) Results suggested that if physical conditions permit, compared with hemiarthroplasty group, femoral neck fractures patients aged > 60 years old in the total hip arthroplasty group had better hip function, but no significant difference was found in dislocation, deep infection and mortality between both groups.